Skip to main content

Start Making a Reader Today (SMART) is a volunteer tutoring program designed to provide training and supervision to help community volunteers succeed in tutoring struggling readers in grades 1-2. Children nominated as at-risk by their teachers are tutored 30 minutes a day twice a week through first and second grade. Tutors are given a handbook with simple strategies for reading with children. These focus on letter-sound relationships, predictions, reading stories in many genres, and asking questions about core elements of the texts.

Clearinghouse and Evidence Level


Level 1

Evidence for ESSA


In December, 2015, Congress passed the Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA), replacing No Child Left Behind (NCLB) as the main federal law governing K-12 education. Within the bill are provisions with potentially revolutionary implications for education because they promote the use of federal dollars on programs with evidence of effectiveness. More evidence on what works to increase student success is available now than ever before, and ESSA encourages the use of strategies with evidence of impact.

Level 1

Strong evidence from at least one well-designed and well-implemented experimental study.

Quick Stats

Content Focus Area

Curriculum, Instruction, and Assessment

Grade Band

Elementary School

Number of studies

2

Intervention Information


The information below provides details and characteristics of the intervention. The presented information is sourced from another clearinghouse. To learn more about the intervention, click through to the Source clearinghouse.

This page displays information on the population and settings in which studies were conducted on the intervention’s effectiveness. This means that the intervention has some level of positive evidence in the listed student populations and context. Remember to take your school’s context and population into consideration when selecting an intervention. Read more on selecting interventions.

Resource Type Program Evaluation This presents the grade level of students represented in the reviewed studies for this intervention. On the OEBC, grade bands are categorized into four levels: Early Childhood (Birth-Age 5), Elementary School (Grades K-5), Middle School (Grades 6-8), and High School (Grades 9-12).
Subject Area English Language Arts This refers to the school subjects: English Language Arts, Math, Science, and Social Studies. An intervention will be tagged with a subject if a reviewed study by the source clearinghouse has found that the intervention led to positive results in learning in that subject.
Setting
  • Rural
  • Urban
This presents the setting represented in the reviewed studies for this intervention. On the OEBC, setting has three categories: Rural, Urban, and Suburban.
Demographic
  • African-American
  • Economically Disadvantaged
  • White
Demographic information refers to the student’s race/ethnicity and gender. It also includes information on subpopulations (e.g. Students with Disabilities, English Learners, Economically Disadvantaged, Justice Involved, and Foster Care). On the OEBC, an intervention is only tagged with demographic information if that intervention is specifically designed for, and has been reviewed on, that demographic. Please click through to the source clearinghouse to find total demographic breakdowns of all students who have taken part in a study on the intervention.
Training Needed Not Listed This indicates if the source clearinghouse has information on training needed to implement the intervention.
Length of Program or Delivery Listed This indicates if the source clearinghouse has information on how long the intervention takes to implement (e.g. session delivery time and/or how many days or weeks it takes to implement).
Cost Not Listed This indicates if the source clearinghouse has information on the cost to implement the intervention.
Effect Size Listed This indicates if the source clearinghouse provides an effect size for the intervention. Please visit the source clearinghouse to find the effect size and read more about the studies on this intervention.

Studies Cited


  • May, H., Sirinades, P., Gray, A., & Goldsworthy, H. (2016). Reading Recovery: An Evaluation of the Four-Year i3 Scale-Up
  • A Research Report. University of Delaware Center for Research in Education & Social Policy.
  • Pinnell, G., Lyons, C., DeFord, D., Bryk, A., & Seltzer, M. 1994). Comparing instructional models for the literacy education of high-risk first graders. Reading Research Quarterly, 29 (1), 9-39.